Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
European Commission logo
Competence Centre on Microeconomic Evaluation - Tools

Job practice: an evaluation and a comparison with vocational labour market training programmes

We have estimated effects of job practice for participants entering the programme between 1999 and 2006. On average the programme had a moderately sized positive effect for the participants - the expected time to work for the unemployed participants was reduced by around six per cent over a 700 days long follow-up horizon counted from the programme start date. Participation also gave rise to higher future labour income and a reduction in social assistance take-up. When we compare job practice with labour market training, we get the somewhat paradoxical result that job practice participants would have gained more from training, while the training participants would have gained equally much from both programmes. A re-shuffling of participants between the programmes, hence, would have been associated with higher average effects.

Authors
Anders Forslund
Linus Liljeberg
Lea Von Trott Zu Solz
Country
Sweden
Publication Year
2013
Ranges
Intervention
Intervention Start Year
1999
Intervention End Year
2006
Evaluation
Evaluation Start Year
1999
Evaluation End Year
2008
Policy field
Training
Classroom/vocational training
On-the-job training
Target group
Labour market status
Unemployed (All cat.)
Details
Funding Source
Other
Outcome Variable
Income/wages
Data Source
Administrative
Evaluation Method
PSM